[Oz-teachers] Tweeting @reply
nathan.beveridge at qut.edu.au
Fri May 15 09:23:11 EST 2009
Replies on twitter can be a little confusing sometimes because you can't see the context from the original tweet. I agree though that it can be a way to find new people to follow. I realised early after couple of replies that because once a message is out there on twitter you can't get rid of it (that I know of? I would be interested to find out if you can) when you are using an application like tweet deck or twirl, etc the replies people have sent to you are there on your screen all the time. Even if they are marked as read they are right there on my screen.
People reply to direct tweets then the replies are visible right? But the world can't see the context of the reply? So everyone knows you sent a direct message.
From: oz-teachers-bounces at rite.ed.qut.edu.au [mailto:oz-teachers-bounces at rite.ed.qut.edu.au] On Behalf Of stephen at melbpc.org.au
Sent: Friday, 15 May 2009 1:22 AM
To: link at anu.edu.au; oz-teachers at rite.ed.qut.edu.au
Subject: [Oz-teachers] Tweeting @reply
Twitter Replies Are Back, With a Catch
Ian Paul, May 15, 2009 12:04 am
Twitter has yielded to user outrage and reinstated its @reply feature.
On Tuesday, Tweeps (Twitter people) around the world were angered when
Twitter yanked the opt-in feature that allowed you to see Twitter replies
that were sent from people you follow to people you don't.
Now, it's back - but in a revised form.
Many said this feature gave Twitter a cocktail-party-feel, and was a way
for users, including myself, to find other interesting people to follow.
If you saw an intriguing post from someone you were following directed at
a user you didn't know, you would find the message that caused the reply
in the first place and see who the person you followed was talking to.
If you liked what the new person was saying, or thought they might be
interesting, you'd follow them.
Twitter's change to the @reply system made that type of conversation
tracking impossible since it hid any @replies created by people you were
Tweeprage was swift after Twitter's change and by 1 PM PST yesterday, the
@replies feature was back, but with a catch.
Here's how the new system works: imagine you're following Ashton Kutcher
on Twitter, but you're not following his wife Demi Moore. If Ashton types
in Demi's username to send her a message or a reply via Twitter you will
see it; however, if Ashton hits the reply button to respond to Demi you
won't see his message to her.
Under the old system--which you had to opt into under the settings menu--
you would see every tweet coming from Ashton directed at Demi (excluding
direct messages which are private).
When Twitter first yanked the reply feature, the information network said
it did so because the feature was an "undesirable and confusing option."
Many regular Tweeters voiced their outrage on Twitter using
the "#fixreplies" hashtag to get the word out, prompting Twitter to
rethink their decision.
After reinstating the reply feature, Twitter further explained that it
removed the one-sided replies because the feature didn't scale, and
Twitter has grown rapidly in recent months. Twitter also said the replies
feature was blunt, inconsistent, and confusing.
Despite Twitter's acquiescence, many users are still not happy with the
replies reinstatement since it doesn't give users the old functionality
they'd grown used to.
But Twitter says it is working on a new feature that will give you "far
more control" over the accounts you follow. Twitter says this will be
a "per-user" setting.
I'm not sure what that means, but is it just me or do I smell the faint
waft of service charges heading towards the Twitt-o-sphere in the near
Hot Tip: British actor and Twitter addict Stephen Fry says that putting
a "-" or any other character right before an @reply will let all your
followers see your one-sided replies.
Connect with Ian Paul on Twitter ( @ianpaul).
oz-teachers mailing list
oz-teachers at rite.ed.qut.edu.au
More information about the oz-teachers